Who uses more water?
A Duke undergraduate analyzes Durham water use and comes to some surprising conclusions
Thursday, March 13, 2008
print
|
email
|
digg
|
del.icio.us
Durham, NC -- Duke junior Wichsinee Wibulpolprasert wasn’t paying much attention to the ongoing drought in Durham and throughout the Southeast -- until last semester.
“We always have floods, not droughts,” she said about her native Thailand. (Her name is pronounced wish-see-nee wee-boon-pon-pra-sert.)
But now, Wibulpolprasert knows more than most people about Durham’s water use: Because of a research project she undertook, she can tell you what kinds of households in Durham use the most water.
Two events focused Wibulpolprasert’s attention on the drought. First, she brought a car to campus for the first time last semester and learned that city water restrictions prevented her from washing her car herself. At the same time, she was taking a course on urban economics and chose to write a paper on what determines how much water residents consume.
“This is the first time I applied theory to the real world,” she said.
Although the study was small -- it looked at 5,000 households during a one-month period -- Wibulpolprasert’s conclusions could be helpful for officials drafting policies to reduce water use, according to Charles Becker, who taught the course. (See the study.)
One of Wibulpolprasert’s conclusions was that people in new homes use considerably more water on average than people in older homes, even when she took into account other factors such as lot size, family size and ownership status. Another finding: People with higher incomes use more water on average, again controlling for other factors.
Investigating Urban EconomicsProfessor Charles Becker’s Urban Economics course takes its subject from near at hand: Durham and the Piedmont. Students are challenged to apply tools of economic analysis to ethical and socio-economic issues. In addition to Wichsinee Wibulpolprasert’s findings connected to household water use, other student projects came to these conclusions: * Fifth-grade end-of-grade test scores at Durham elementary schools vary by the percentage of students receiving free and reduced lunches, but not by race when other factors are accounted for, according to senior Kristen Manderscheid. * Housing intended for low-income residents in Durham is more likely to be built in neighborhoods with higher minority representation and poverty but newer housing units, senior Lwera Covington reported. * Although Durham has higher crime rates than Seattle, the differences disappear for neighborhoods in the two cities with similar demographics, graduate student Johannes Fritz concluded. * Looking at population growth for different racial and ethnic groups in the Piedmont region of North Carolina, senior Guy Regev found between 1990 and 2000, white and especially black populations grew more in cities with higher average education levels and Hispanic populations grew more in cities with lower average educational levels. |
But the connection between water use and income reinforced an assumption she had going into the project she said: “The richer would use more water.”
Becker, who taught the Urban Economics course and advised Wibulpolprasert on the project, said her research looks at some key issues.
“What is a realistic target for water reduction? That is the real question,” Becker said about the topic. “There’s virtually no analysis of individual water use, not just in Durham, but across the country.”
Wibulpolprasert’s report has policy implications, he said.
“Her work reinforces the argument for a rational conservation plan with little or limited impact on the poor that involves rising [graduated] price rates,” he said.
Analyzing the data was only one part of Wibulpolprasert’s project. She first had to get them. That meant making repeated visits and phone calls to the City of Durham’s customer billing department to request residential water use data in an electronic format she could manipulate. Her persistence paid off, and she obtained water department billing records for 5,000 households for July 2007.
She then downloaded block-by-block demographic information about Durham households from the Census Bureau’s American FactFinder website. She got statistics on factors she thought might be affect water use: family size, lot size, income, race, age of householder, age of house, ownership status, house value and rooms per house. She then used statistical software to perform a mathematical analysis called regression that isolates the influence of each factor while controlling for all the others.
“Very few people -- even graduate students -- will be involved in getting data from a [primary] source,” Becker said. “For Wichsinee to have done that is a major task.”
Both Becker and Wibulpolprasert acknowledge limits to the study. The major one involves a statistical feature called variance. The two found that water use fluctuates greatly even among households with similar demographic profiles. The factors they could identify as having an effect -- family size, income, lot size, value of house and age of house -- explain only a very small proportion of an individual resident’s water consumption. The rest appears to result from variables they were unable to measure, or from idiosyncratic personal preferences.
“We’d never figure out exactly who are the people obsessed with keeping their lawns green,” Becker explained.
One resident has certainly been persuaded by the study -- Wibulpolprasert, who lives an apartment on Central Campus. She said she has begun adopting water-saving measures such as using hand sanitizer without water to wash her hands, not running the water while washing dishes and even cutting off the shower when soaping up.
“I keep telling people to conserve water,” she said.

